About Me

Name: J.M. Powers
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Liberals And Their Tolerance

Why must the liberals always show us up with their demonstrations of compassion, tolerance and open-mindedness?  They are always making us look bad.  One of the more recent examples is Speech Professor John Matteson of Los Angeles Community College.

Yes, it seems the good professor gave his class an open speech assignment, if that’s not open-minded and tolerant, I don’t know what is.  The only problem was that he failed to mention beforehand that any Conservative or Christian speech would not be tolerated.

Jonathan Lopez stood up to give his speech, the subject was his faith…one aspect of his faith is regarding marriage.  Jonathan read from the dictionary, the definition of marriage.  But he was stopped short.

Professor Matteson called Jonathan a “Fascist B@stard” and then told the class that anyone who wanted to, could leave if they were offended.  Strangely enough, no one got up to leave.  When the ever tolerant and open-minded public employee realized that he was the only one offended, he simply dismissed the class. 

According to the Alliance Defense Fund After Proposition 8 (the marriage amendment) was passed on November 4th, Professor Matteson told his entire class, “If you voted yes on Proposition 8, you are a fascist b@stard.”

Jonathan later complained about the censorship, and Professor Matteson threatened to expel him.  But of course he didn’t stop there.  Professor Matteson refused to grade the speech, he simply wrote on the evaluation, “Ask God what your grade is.”

Well Jonathan, I’m no theologian, but based on what I know of God’s Word and this situation, I think it’s safe to say that God says you get an A.  You stood up for, and spoke the truth, even when you had to have known that you would be ridiculed and persecuted for doing so.  In my book, you definitely get an A, and I think God would agree.

As for the Professor, you get an F.  You are a public employee and you are supposed to be teaching students how to speak, NOT what to speak.  You should be fired from your job for sub-standard performance.  And as for your Anti-American behavior, well, fortunately we still live in a free country.  So you can spew your Anti-American hate speech outside, just not on the public’s dime.  

 

Regardless of whether you agree with Jonathan Lopez on the issue of marriage, we as citizens should be outraged that this kind of violation of our First Amendment is perpetrated by public employees.  I strongly urge everyone to call or write the College and express your anger at this kind of Anti-American behavior.

Contact info for the Los Angeles Community College 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Press Is Our Enemy

I think we all realize that our open southern border is a real problem.  Illegal aliens are raping, murdering, stealing our identities and assaulting our citizenry, not to mention sucking up welfare dollars by the billions and devastating our medical facilities and our economy in general.

What do we hear from the media?  We need the illegal aliens here, the Mexicans are doing the jobs that Americans won’t do.  Well, for once, the media is right. 

But it’s not picking cabbage or washing dishes that Americans won’t do, Americans have always done that.  So what job won’t Americans do? 

There are two huge industries that need workers…and Americans won’t do it.  Americans don’t do it.  In order for these multi-billion dollar businesses to survive, Illegal Aliens have to do the work.

I’m talking about Drug and Human Trafficking and they are both big business.  Someone has to run these drugs.  Someone has to sell these drugs.  Someone has to kidnap American Citizens and sell them to prostitution rings.  Someone has to kidnap American Citizen and hold them for ransom.  And Americans just won’t do it. 

Mexico City leads the world in kidnappings.  But guess who is number 2?  Moscow? Nope.  Bogota Columbia? Nope.  How about Phoenix Arizona?  You got it.  The internationally enormous Phoenix Arizona.  Why would Phoenix be number 2 in the world for kidnappings?  Very simple…its proximity to the U.S.-Mexico Border.  A person is kidnapped every day in Phoenix.  They are held for ransom or sold into prostitution rings.

What is our government doing about this alarming problem?  When Compean and Ramos, two border patrol agents, shot a drug smuggler/illegal alien, Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila of Mexicoin the buttocks as he tried to escape, the two hero border patrol agents were given medals of valor….no wait, that’s what should have happened.  Nope, they were sentenced to 11+ years in prison.

The guy they shot had 800 pounds of marijuana in his van.  After he was released, he went back to Mexico and was caught again bringing massive amounts of drugs into our country.

But never fear!  ABC News has the answer.  In the online article about the Phoenix kidnapping problem (Kidnapping Capital of the U.S.A.), they refer to a “Related” story, blaming the problem on our right to own guns (U.S. Guns Arming Mexican Drug Gangs; Second Amendment to Blame?).  But they don’t stop there.  Their “Related Story” links go on:

U.S. Guns: Drug Gangs’ Weapons of Choice

U.S. Guns: 'Weapons of War' in Mexico

In the ‘U.S. Guns Arming Mexican Drug Gangs’ article, ABC states the problem, as they see it,

“But U.S. efforts to stop the smuggling of tens of thousands of guns to Mexico, including high-powered assault weapons, have been hampered by lenient American gun laws and the Bush administration's failure to give priority to anti-gun smuggling efforts”

In the article, that statement is followed by this sorry excuse for journalism,

“officials tell ABC News for a report Tuesday on ABC News' "World News With Charles Gibson."”

So apparently ABC wants us to believe that multiple “officials” made the exact same statement, and all of them are unnamed.  Oh I know, maybe all of these officials said the same thing all in unison and they couldn’t tell who all said it.  Yeah, that’s probably it.

ABC, who holds a chair in Barrack Obama’s Department of Propaganda, thinks that disarming American Citizens will solve everything. 

Well, it might.  Just look at Australia.  After banning private gun ownership in 1996 and subsequently confiscating 650,000 guns, crime dramatically dropped…oh wait, I had that report upside down.  I guess it didn’t work.  Homicides are up 3.2%.  Assaults are up 8.6%.  Armed Robberies are up 45%.  In Victoria, gun homicides are up 300%.  And there has been a reported “Dramatic Increase” in home burglaries and assaults on the elderly.

In 1997, the UK banned private gun ownership and in the 2 years following the ban, the use of handguns in crime rose by 40%.

But hey, just because it has failed everywhere it has been tried, doesn’t mean it won’t work here.

Now let’s take a look at the opposite scenario.  In 1981, Kennesaw Georgia had a crime rate much higher than the national average, (4,332 per 100,000 as opposed to the national average of 3,899 per 100,000).  But in March of 1982, the town passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. 

But despite the predictions of increased violence and “Wild West” style showdowns, there hasn’t been a single resident involved in a fatal shooting since the passage of that law.  Ah, but what happened to the crime rate? Well, it went from 4,332 per 100,000 in 1981 to 2,027 per 100,000 in 2005.  Yeah, but that’s a “per capita” rate, what happened to the population?  Prior to the law, Kennesaw had a population of 5,242.  In 2005, the population had increased to 28,189.

So ignoring empirical evidence, facts and logic, the media thinks making it easier for illegal aliens to come here and abolishing the Second Amendment is the solution to our crime problem.  But hey, when has the press ever been interested in facts and logic?

And now that their messiah is in office and the love affair has moved to the next level, hang on to your guns, the assault is coming.  The President is limited in his power, the Press is not.  The War on our Freedom is here…the President is a pawn, the Press is the Enemy.

The good news is, the Press only has the power we the people give them, so let’s join together and strip them of their power. Stop watching and reading network news, start writing letters.  Let them know how you feel about their Anti-American bias, slander and outright lies.  Stop patronizing their sponsors and let them know why.  Get your news from only reliable sources like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Mark Levine and others like them.  Patronize their sponsors and let them know why.  Stop reading the New York Times and Newsweek and start reading the Washington Times and National Review.  Together we can stop this attack on our Constitution, together we can cut them off at the knees. 

Write your elected officials, write the networks, write the papers, write the sponsors and write them all often.  Don’t wait for your voice to be heard, make it heard. 

I have tried to make it a little easier by supplying the contact information of  just a few of the biggest Enemies of the State.

ABC News: http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3068843

CBS News: Contact Us or http://www.cbscorporation.com/contact_info/index.php

NBC/MSNBS News: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10285339/

CNN: http://www.cnn.com/feedback/

New York Times: letters@nytimes.com or http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/infoservdirectory.html

Newsweek: Editors@newsweek.com or http://www.newsweek.com/id/38406

LA Times: http://www.latimes.com/services/site/la-contactus,0,3944908.htmlstory

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bashing Big Oil

Bashing the Oil Industry is becoming more and more popular these days.  Nearly every liberal campaign commercial I hear on the radio or see on television, accuses their opponent of being friends of Big Oil, clearly insinuating that the oil companies are the enemy. Oil companies have long been one of the media’s favorite targets for criticism, accusations and abuse.

It is primarily a Liberal/Democrat bandwagon, although it seems that others have recently jumped aboard. 

A recent McCain/Palin television ad that touts the duo as “The Original Mavericks”, boasts that “She (Palin) took on Big Oil”.

“Took on Big Oil”? Now the Republican Presidential/Vice Presidential candidates are adopting the Democrat’s lingo. “Big Oil” is a term liberals use when they talk about the Oil Industry. Which is comical, because they say it like it’s a bad thing. When you place the word “Big” in front of an entity, that means growth. In the case of Oil, which is a business, growth would mean success. So, “Big Oil” would be synonymous with “Successful Oil”. 

It is consistent for liberals to use “Big Oil” as an insult, because they are against success in business. But McCain/Palin using it as such is disappointing…at best.  Liberals want Big Government, not Big Business. McCain/Palin should not be adopting the liberal mentality of Anti-Successful Business. For me, the aforementioned ad is not going to make it easier to vote for them in November. I’m not a big fan of McCain, but I like Palin, and I am really disappointed that they would brag about her taking on Big Oil, like that’s a good thing.

But I digress. 

Executives of the oil companies are regularly brought up before Congress and lectured, reprimanded, bullied, and even threatened. Their success is used as a truncheon. 

In May, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D, CA) scolded top executives of the five largest U.S. oil companies saying, “You rack up record profits…quarter after quarter after quarter.” What a moronic thing to say. The idea of business is to profit. When they don’t profit, “Big Government” has to bail them out.

Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D, FL) said, “I can’t say that there is evidence that you are manipulating the price, but I believe that you probably are. So prove to me that you are not.” Sounds like a Witch Hunt to me.

Senator Dick Durbin (D, IL) said, “Is there anybody here that has any concerns about what you’re doing to this country with the prices that you’re charging and the profits that you’re taking?” This guy is stupidity personified. The oil companies are taking a third of the profit that Dick’s organization (Big Government) takes.

Senator Pat Leahy (D, VT) said, “People we represent are hurting, the companies you represent are profiting.” As though people are hurting because of the oil companies’ profits. What about the Federal Government’s profit? I guess their profit doesn’t hurt anyone. Isn’t profit the objective in business?

On average, “Big Oil” makes a 4% profit on gasoline. “Big Government” makes 15%. So, on average, “Big Government’s” profit is MORE THAN 3 TIMES that of “Big Oil’s”. And keep in mind, oil companies do ALL the work, the government does nothing to extract, refine or deliver. They collect MORE THAN TRIPLE the profits, and then demonize the oil companies for their MUCH, MUCH, MUCH SMALLER profits.  And let’s not forget that “Big Government” is constantly doing everything they can to make it harder and harder for the oil companies to do their job.

According to Dr. Mark J. Perry, economics professor from the University of Michigan, Exxon Mobile paid almost $3 in taxes, for every $1 in profit, during the first quarter of 2008.

According to Dr. Perry, oil companies paid $138 billion in corporate income taxes in 2006. The bottom 75% of all individual taxpayers, which is about 100 million people, paid about $136 million in 2006.

Exxon Mobile has paid an average of $27 billion in taxes, over the last 3 years. About the same as the bottom 50% of individual taxpayers (65 million people).

According to the U.S. Department of Energy and the Bureau of Economic Analysis, EXCLUDING onshore royalty payments, local property taxes, and state severance and sales taxes, oil companies have paid more than $2.2 trillion in federal and state taxes, over the past 25 years, more than three times their profits during the same period.

Aside from the fact that “Big Oil” largely pays the exorbitant, and ever climbing bills of “Big Government”, it also provides us with what is probably the most versatile substance on the planet. Not only is it extremely versatile, but absolutely necessary to our way of life.

Oil provides us with a plethora of products like plastics (which nearly every product imaginable is made of, to one degree or another), medical equipment and supplies, home improvement products, toiletries, cosmetics, detergents, eye glasses and sunglasses, insect repellants and insecticides, fishing rods, line and lures, electrical wiring insulation, food preservatives and packaging, adhesives, clothing, and lubricants, like motor oil, just to name a few.

Not to mention, it provides us with energy. Not just the gasoline we put in our cars, but much more, like diesel, kerosene, jet fuel, methane, propane and butane. 

The entire transportation industry is completely reliant on oil. Without oil, there would be no food in our grocery stores, there would be nothing in any of the stores. No cars at the dealerships, but you couldn’t take the bus, because there would be no public transportation system. This country would come to a screeching, sudden halt.

The facts is, every single industry, every company (regardless of size), every household, every individual, and every government agency (from federal down to the smallest local) are completely dependent on oil.

Democrats in Congress have prevented us from building any new refineries for 31 years.

Foreign oil imports increased 45% (which, at the time was 3,574,000 barrels per day) and U.S. oil production dropped 19% (which was 1,349,000 barrels per day) during the Clinton Administration.

President Clinton vetoed legislation that was passed by the House and Senate, that would have allowed drilling to begin in ANWR. If he had not done so, that area would be producing the amount of oil we import from Saudi Arabia (1 million barrels per day)

Democrats in Congress have defeated all bills that would allow U.S. offshore drilling.

Democrats defeated 51 to 44, a motion on the Senate floor that would have allowed state governors authority to explore the Outer Continental Shelf.

Democrats are constantly attacking and demonizing oil companies and obstructing drilling, despite the fact that U.S oil consumption has increased more than 30%, since 1985, but U.S. production has decreased about 40%.

There are 19 billion barrels of oil under U.S. public lands that is off limits to drilling, thanks to liberals.

Liberals in the media and in government are lying to us about “Big Oil’s” big profits. They are taxing the crap out of the industry and doing everything they can to prevent them from doing their job, despite the fact that we need them. 

They do everything they can to convince the American people to hate the oil industry. 

Considering how useful oil is, how dependent on it we are, and what a blessing it has been for our country; why would liberals want to demonize, obstruct and punish those who provide us with it?

Representative Maxine Waters (D, CA)(how surprising!) answered that question on May 22nd, during the House’s grilling of oil executives. John Hofmeister, President of Shell Oil testified that there would be ever-increasing prices, “if we are prohibited from finding new reserves, new opportunities to increase supplies.” Representative Waters responded with, “And guess what this liberal would be all about? This liberal would be all about socialize…uh, um, would be all about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies.”

There you have it, straight from the horses as…uh, um, mouth. They want to socialize industry, especially the oil industry. There’s too much money to be made there for these socialist liberals to allow private citizens to make it. They want it for themselves. If they can control the oil, they can control the people, which is what they have wanted all along. For them, Big Government isn’t big enough, they want it to be Big Brother big, controlling every aspect of the citizen’s lives.

So let’s call it like it is. Liberal Democrats in Washington aren’t progressive, they repeatedly stand in the way of progress. They are Socialists. If you don’t like the word Socialist, how’s Marxist grab you?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »